logo
Please note!
This fact brief was originally published as an experiment to test the concepts behind fact briefs.
Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of useful information in fact briefs like this one, not all of them reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.

Will Washington state police reforms prevent officers from chasing a violent suspect?

By Alexis Tereszcuk
NO

Contrary to the claims in a social media post, a series of new laws do not prohibit police officers in Washington state from pursuing a violent criminal if the officers did not witness the crime themselves. Nor do the new laws prohibit police from making "welfare checks" on individuals, as the post claims.

The post floats theoretical situations in which law enforcement officers in the state supposedly will be restricted from some duties.

One made-up situation was that police could not chase a suspected child abductor unless officers witnessed the crime.

The language in the legislation, HB 1054, contradicts that claim, saying officers can "engage in a vehicular pursuit" for a suspect if there is "probable cause" for violent offenses or sex offense.

The legislation also does not prohibit officers from making welfare checks, according to one state legislator.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR
Lead Stories is a fact checking and debunking website at the intersection of big data and journalism that launched in 2015. It scouts for trending stories, images, videos and posts that contain false information in order to fact check them as quickly as possible. It actively monitors the fake-news ecosystem and doesn’t wait for reader tips or reports before getting started on a story.
FACT BRIEF BY
facebook
twitter
email
email