Sunday, Oct. 18, 2020
Do researchers caution against overreliance on ‘rapid’ tests for the coronavirus?
The Food and Drug Administration has approved six "rapid" coronavirus tests for emergency use, and they are being used, for example, to screen air travelers and event participants (as at the White House). Based on data so far, they are more likely to fail to detect the presence of the virus than lab tests that usually take longer to process.
Researchers think that even if imperfect, large-scale use can help monitor risks from the virus across the population. Health authorities caution that a negative result from a single test is not conclusive, and does not eliminate the need for other preventative measures such as masks and social distancing. "The White House outbreak is a very good illustration of the limitations of rapid testing," MIT Technology Review said. "But it should not deter us from the strategy entirely—we just need to use the technology properly."
This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
Sources
- FDA: 'Antigen' tests authorized for emergency use
- United Airlines: First US carrier to make COVID-19 tests available to customers
- MIT: How accurate is the COVID-19 diagnostic test?
- Centers for Disease Control: Interim guidance for rapid antigen testing
- STAT: Even imperfect COVID-19 tests can help control the pandemic
- MIT Technology Review: Rapid COVID tests can work if you avoid making the White House's mistakes
About fact briefs
Fact briefs are bite-sized, well-sourced explanations that offer clear "yes" or "no" answers to questions, confusions, and unsupported claims circulating online. They rely on publicly available data and documents, often from the original source. Fact briefs are written and published by Gigafact contributor publications.
See all fact briefs
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.
Learn MoreLatest Fact Briefs
Is there a scientific consensus that life begins at conception?
Thursday, Aug. 4, 2022
Do countries around the world subsidize fossil fuels?
Wednesday, Aug. 3, 2022
Is the repeal of Roe v. Wade expected to increase the maternal death rate?
Wednesday, Jul. 27, 2022