Thursday, Apr. 24, 2025
Do the 31,000 signatures of the OISM Petition Project invalidate the scientific consensus on climate change?
Climatologists made up only 0.1% of signatories to a 1998 petition denying human-caused climate change — the consensus among qualified scientists stands.
Anyone claiming they had a science degree could sign the petition without expertise in climate science. There is a strong consensus among actively publishing climate scientists on the existence of human-made climate change that has only grown since 1998.
The 31,487 signatures, many found to be fictional or unverifiable, would represent 0.25% of all U.S. science graduates. Holding a science degree does not indicate expertise in scientific fields outside one’s specialty.
The petition was accompanied by a manuscript deceptively formatted to resemble the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. PNAS disavowed any affiliation with the manuscript and rejected its conclusions.
A 2021 review of 88,125 peer-reviewed climate change papers published since 2012 found that the climate change consensus exceeded 99%.
This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
Sources
- Media Matters for USA 700 Club anchor touted global warming skeptics' petition reportedly signed by non-scientists, fictitious characters
- HuffPost The 30,000 Global Warming Petition Is Easily-Debunked Propaganda
- National Academy of Sciences Statement of the Council of the NAS Regarding Global Change Petition
- The Seattle Times Jokers Add Fake Names To Warming Petition
- Scientific American SKEPTICISM ABOUT SKEPTICS
- DeSmog Oregon Petition
- Scholars & Rogues Federal education data shows OISM’s climate change denying Petition Project actually a tiny minority
- NASA Scientific Consensus
- Environmental Research Letters Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
About fact briefs
Fact briefs are bite-sized, well-sourced explanations that offer clear "yes" or "no" answers to questions, confusions, and unsupported claims circulating online. They rely on publicly available data and documents, often from the original source. Fact briefs are written and published by Gigafact contributor publications.
See all fact briefs
Skeptical Science is a non-profit science education organization. Our goal is to remove a roadblock to climate action by building public resilience against climate misinformation. We achieve this by publishing debunking of climate myths as well as providing resources for educators, communicators, scientists, and the general public. Skeptical Science was founded and is led by John Cook, a Senior Research Fellow with the Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change at the University of Melbourne.
Learn MoreLatest Fact Briefs
Is climate change a net benefit to society?
Friday, Apr. 18, 2025
Is the sun responsible for global warming?
Thursday, Apr. 10, 2025
Is Mars warming?
Thursday, Apr. 3, 2025