Skip to content

Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025

Does the typical environmental review have a longer timeline than the Golden Gate Bridge’s construction?

Gabriel Vinocur, Econofact
no

Building the Golden Gate Bridge today might require a lengthier process than in the 1930s, but the average environmental review is shorter than the bridge’s construction timeline.

The Golden Gate Bridge was completed in 1937 after roughly four and a half years of construction. Feasibility studies for the bridge started in 1919.

In comparison, the median duration of completing an environmental impact statement (EIS) was just over two years in 2024. 

A comparable project to the Golden Gate Bridge would likely have a longer environmental assessment timeline, however. It took eight years (2000-2008) to complete the EIS for the 1.6 mile-long Presidio Parkway approach to the Golden Gate Bridge. The bridge itself is 1.7 miles long. 

Environmental impact statements assess the potential environmental consequences of infrastructure projects and provide opportunities for affected communities to submit public comments.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.

Sources

About fact briefs

Fact briefs are bite-sized, well-sourced explanations that offer clear "yes" or "no" answers to questions, confusions, and unsupported claims circulating online. They rely on publicly available data and documents, often from the original source. Fact briefs are written and published by newsrooms in the Gigafact network.

See all fact briefs

EconoFact is a non-partisan publication designed to bring key facts and incisive analysis to the national debate on economic and social policies. Launched in January 2017, it is written by leading academic economists from across the country who belong to the EconoFact Network. It is published by the Edward R. Murrow Center for a Digital World at The Fletcher School at Tufts University.

Learn More

Latest Fact Briefs

Be a Friend of facts

Help us fund more great fact briefs like this one.