Skip to content

Monday, May. 11, 2026

Are OUI checkpoints unconstitutional? | Fact brief


no

OUI checkpoints are not categorically unconstitutional, but there are restrictions.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz (1990) that sobriety checkpoints — if conducted properly — do not violate the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches.

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court had reached a similar conclusion in State v. Leighton (1988). The court said OUI roadblocks can be constitutional if police follow clear rules, keep the stops brief and have a strong public safety reason for conducting them.

That doesn’t mean every checkpoint is lawful. Maine courts consider whether they are carefully planned, safely run, publicly announced and brief for drivers, and whether the rules for stopping vehicles are applied consistently.

In State v. Kent (2011), Maine’s highest court threw out evidence from an OUI roadblock because the state failed to show that the checkpoint was planned or carried out consistently with the Fourth Amendment.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.

About fact briefs

Fact briefs are bite-sized, well-sourced explanations that offer clear "yes" or "no" answers to questions, confusions, and unsupported claims circulating online. They rely on publicly available data and documents, often from the original source. Fact briefs are written and published by newsrooms in the Gigafact network.

See all fact briefs