Sunday, Aug. 9, 2020
Has a major Washington state dam removal project delivered the expected benefits?
Anticipated benefits from a $325 million project to remove two dams on the Elwha River on Washington's Olympic Peninsula have yet to materialize. The project, the largest such effort in the U.S. to date, was completed in 2014.
The dam removals released sediments that caused a general habitat degradation. With harsh environmental changes, fish and insect populations are less diverse than expected. Chinook salmon and steelhead populations have not returned in the levels forecast. Benefits from increased recreation and tourism in the area has yet to materialize.
The original analysis of the project in 1995 understated or missed some significant factors. "Contingent benefits"–projected values from landscape preservation and other non-economic factors–remain the major justification for what was a politically popular project, a 2019 review concluded.
This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
Sources
- University of Missouri--St. Louis: Retrospective benefit-cost analysis on Elwha river dam removal
- Evergreen State College: Original economic analysis of Elwha River Restoration Project (1995)
- Research Gate: Elwha river dam removal sediment load
- Research Gate: River landscape responses to dam removal
- Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission: Elwha river restoration update
- National Geographic: World's largest dam removal unleashes river
About fact briefs
Fact briefs are bite-sized, well-sourced explanations that offer clear "yes" or "no" answers to questions, confusions, and unsupported claims circulating online. They rely on publicly available data and documents, often from the original source. Fact briefs are written and published by newsrooms in the Gigafact network.
See all fact briefs
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.
Learn MoreLatest Fact Briefs
Is there a scientific consensus that life begins at conception?
Thursday, Aug. 4, 2022
Do countries around the world subsidize fossil fuels?
Wednesday, Aug. 3, 2022
Is the repeal of Roe v. Wade expected to increase the maternal death rate?
Wednesday, Jul. 27, 2022