logo
Please note!
This fact brief was originally published as an experiment to test the concepts behind fact briefs.
Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of useful information in fact briefs like this one, not all of them reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.

Does a study published by JAMA Pediatrics prove that face masks are dangerous for children?

By Dana Ford
NO

Despite being published in a well-respected medical journal, the study has significant methodological flaws. Its findings run counter to established norms and recommendations about children and masks. Experts consulted by Lead Stories expressed serious concerns about the study.

The study said that children wearing face masks inhale unacceptable levels of carbon dioxide and, thus, shouldn't be forced to wear them. Both the study's conclusion and methodology have been questioned.

Eve Bloomgarden, one of the doctors who wrote a public response to the study and asked JAMA to retract it, told Lead Stories: "We always say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and this is an extraordinary claim with no evidence."

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children ages 2 and up who are not fully vaccinated continue to wear masks to slow COVID-19. That's consistent with guidance from the CDC.

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR
Lead Stories is a fact checking and debunking website at the intersection of big data and journalism that launched in 2015. It scouts for trending stories, images, videos and posts that contain false information in order to fact check them as quickly as possible. It actively monitors the fake-news ecosystem and doesn’t wait for reader tips or reports before getting started on a story.
FACT BRIEF BY
facebook
twitter
email
email