Are renewables less ‘energy dense’ than other types of energy?

Saturday, March 6, 2021
By Remaya Campbell

Renewable energy sources have a lower energy density than conventional forms of energy, meaning that a given surface area of renewables will produce less power than that same surface area utilized by fossil fuels.

Renewables are nonetheless capable of powering the U.S. on a small amount of land. Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimated in 2008 that solar power could supply electricity to all Americans using just 0.6% of the country's land. They point out for comparison that solar power’s footprint would be less than 2% of farming and grazing land.

Researchers at Columbia University reported in 2009 that including life-cycle factors such as mining and waste storage, solar in sunny areas requires less surface area than coal or nuclear.

Estimates for wind are even lower: CleanTechnica suggested that wind turbines could power the U.S. on “about 0.01% of the land.”

This fact brief is responsive to conversations such as this one.
Between 2020 and 2022, under close editorial supervision, Gigafact contracted a group of freelance writers and editors to test the concepts for fact briefs and provide inputs to our software development process. We call this effort Gigafact Foundry. Over the course of these two years, Gigafact Foundry writers published over 1500 fact briefs in response to claims they found online. Their important work forms the basis of Gigafact formats and editorial guidelines, and is available to the public on Gigafact.org. Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs. If you come across any that you feel are out of date and need to be looked at with fresh eyes, don't hesitate to contact us at support@gigafact.org.